[+18] REVIEW — Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes

It is not yet known which wing of the great horse of spiritual unity will cover the publisher. Will this be the wing of creation and KONAMI will remain afloat, continuing to illuminate the darkness of everyday life with new, hitherto unseen projects (how Silent Hills, Silent Hills, Charles?), or will this wing of extinction force the publisher to sink to the steel horseshoes of greed, vices, hypocrisy and despair?

Until the dots are connected, I propose to remember the past, along with a video about Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes, for the sake of a brighter look, if not into the distant future, then at least September 1, 2015 (release Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain, your KO).

I think you know what to do with all the information… because “the conclusions, as always, remain yours”.

Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes

Best comments

I played demos often and never bought them. Moreover, not a single demo had so much quality diversity (I’m talking about full-fledged briefings).

Well, in general, the second part of the statement justifies the first. This is too well-developed a demo to give it away for nothing. Okay, this is clear, it’s a matter of taste and there’s no need to figure it out.

As for the animation – in general it seems okay, but you show something strange. About 80% of the time, as for me, the action on the screen generally very poorly correlates with what you say, which is only distracting.

And who said that I https://gamblingdata.net/casinos/spin-time-casino/ didn’t read the contents of the blog before writing the PC? .
Yes, I have nothing to say about these “Kazimov’s passions,” but this does not oblige me to remain silent

The text was written back in January, but the visualization was a little late. Maybe we need to be more relevant.

If people don’t know about the post, then they definitely won’t say anything about it. And so, they will see, read, and maybe speak out.

Naturally, the entire video is just my speculation, nothing more. And only in the hands of the viewer there is the power to challenge, agree or ignore my point of view.

I read the news, watched your review, didn’t argue that this was a demo. But when I played, I noticed that this demo was being sold for money, it had a full-fledged text backstory and a bunch of bonus missions created to artificially expand the playing time spent in the game – well, just like in Batman Arena. I played demos often and never bought them. Moreover, not a single demo had so much quality diversity (I’m talking about full-fledged briefings). I also played the MGS 4 demo, which was free and in which you could “feel different aspects of the mechanics and engine”. Therefore, I came to the conclusion that this is not a demo, but DLC released before the release of the main game.
I tried, in the video itself, to hint that it was KONAMI who forced Hideo to sell GZ – only while drawing I noticed how meager this hint turned out to be.
For me, it’s an extremely strange motivation to sell a piece of a game under the pretext “you need to get used to it” – when launching MGS, GTA or Half-Life for the first time, I, like all normal people, did not have the thought: “All that these games lack is the opportunity to buy a sawn-off piece for review.”. Thus, I interpreted his words as disrespect for the players.
I just thought it was funny that a long time ago Hideo was talking about releasing text-based episodes of games, and then suddenly, almost according to the same pattern, GZ comes out – so I decided to talk about such a strange logical chain.

I wrote such a huge cart for you and I understand how much I screwed up with the video. It turns out extremely badly, I thought through the text so that I have to write such large verbal constructions in order to explain my point of view. I’ll try to think through the text better.

And if you’ve read this far, how do you like the animation and the overall integrity of the videos?? You at least watched the first episode (about Hitman: Absolution) and this one, you have a lot of experience and therefore you can tell whether I have prospects or whether I’m just a mole lost underground and unable to survive in the endless darkness called “attempts at self-expression”.

It seems that GZ shot a long time ago, but is still bombing. And I don’t remember anyone vehemently recommending or pushing it. Even in the fandom there are rather reserved recommendations. Although her metacritic is really high.

Throughout the entire video, after every mention of DLC, I wanted to take it and… correct it to “demo”! The demo was released, not DLC! And its structure is exactly “demo”, so that you can feel different aspects of the mechanics and engine. And it wasn’t Kojima who wanted this, most likely, but Konami, judging by what’s been going on between him and Kojima lately.
As for the links given and the fact that Kojima somehow named someone, this is kind of your speculation in general. As for the episodic nature, it’s okay, it’s not clear whether this was said under the influence of the compulsion to somehow justify the release of Ground Zero, it was just abstract reasoning or Hideo is really a money-grabbing goat, but about what he once called the old fans of the series – this is purely your opinion. When changing mechanics from corridor to open world, quite a lot of things change. And you really have to get used to this freedom.

The first comment for a live broadcast will only be good from the blog creator.
If it is written by the audience, then it is verbiage and idle talk. There is no point in looking for new blogs and writing “PC” there, instead of checking out the blog itself and writing on the topic.

“PC” it ​​is good for viewers only if the comment contains information related to the blog. So don’t waste your energy on idle talk.

I understand that, I just don’t think it’s worth the trouble. If people have nothing to say (I’m generalizing for the sake of a word) on a topic, then “PC” is unlikely to correct the situation.

I didn’t say it was obligatory, it was just not worth the effort.
But for the sake of respect, thank you for opening the post, even without saying a word on the topic.